BIOASSAY APPARATUS FOR RODENT OLFACTORY PREFERENCES UNDER LABORATORY AND FIELD CONDITIONSGAWIENOWSKI AM; KEEDY DA; STACEWICZ SAPUNTZAKIS M et al.1979; J. CHEM. ECOL.; USA; DA. 1979; VOL. 5; NO 4; PP. 595-601; BIBL. 11 REF.Article

CROSS-SPECIES FOSTERING: EFFECTS ON THE OLFACTORY PREFERENCE OF ONYCHOMYS TORRIDUS AND PEROMYSCUS LEUCOPUS.MCCARTY R; SOUTHWICK CH.1977; BEHAV. BIOL.; U.S.A.; DA. 1977; VOL. 19; NO 2; PP. 255-260; BIBL. 1 P.Article

INTEREST OF MICE IN CONSPECIFIC MALE ODOURS IS INFLUENCED BY DEGREE OF KINSHIPGILDER PM; SLATER PJB.1978; NATURE; GBR; DA. 1978; VOL. 274; NO 5669; PP. 364-365; BIBL. 10 REF.Article

PREFERENCE FOR NATURAL ODORS IN RAT PUPS: IMPLICATIONS OF A FAILURE TO REPLICATEGALEF BG JR.1981; PHYSIOL. BEHAV.; ISSN 0031-9384; USA; DA. 1981; VOL. 26; NO 5; PP. 783-786; BIBL. 8 REF.Article

ALONG-TERM MEMORY FOR FOOD ODORS IN THE LAND SNAIL, ACHATINA FULICA.CROLL RP; CHASE R.1977; BEHAV. BIOL.; U.S.A.; DA. 1977; VOL. 19; NO 2; PP. 261-268; BIBL. 1 P.Article

THE RESPONSE TO PHEROMONES OF ADULT AND NEWLY EMERGED MEALWORM BEETLES (TENEBRIO MOLITOR L.) (COL., TENEBRIONIDAE)SMART LE; MARTIN AP; CLOUDSLEY THOMPSON JL et al.1980; ENTOMOL. MON. MAG.; ISSN 0013-8908; GBR; DA. 1980; VOL. 116; NO 1392-1395; PP. 139-145; BIBL. 7 REF.Article

RESPONSES OF CAPTIVE-REARED EASTERN KINGSNAKES (LAMPROPELTIS GETULUS) TO SEVERAL PREY ODOR STIMULIWILLIAMS PR JR; BRISBIN IL JR.1978; HERPETOLOGICA; USA; DA. 1978; VOL. 34; NO 1; PP. 79-83; BIBL. 16 REF.Article

REACTION TO OLFACTORY STIMULI IN ODOR-EXPOSED RATSDALLAND T; DOVING KB.1981; BEHAV. NEURAL BIOL.; ISSN 0163-1047; USA; DA. 1981; VOL. 32; NO 1; PP. 79-88; BIBL. 9 REF.Article

SEXUAL AND OLFACTORY PREFERENCES OF NAIVE AND EXPERIENCED MALE HAMSTERSLANDAUER MR; BANKS EM; CARTER CS et al.1978; ANIMAL BEHAV.; GBR; DA. 1978; VOL. 26; NO 2; PP. 611-621; BIBL. 1 P. 1/2Article

SUCKLING INFANT RATS LEARN A PREFERENCE FOR A NOVEL OLFACTORY STIMULUS PAIRED WITH MILK DELIVERYBRAKE SC.1981; SCIENCE; ISSN 0036-8075; USA; DA. 1981; VOL. 211; NO 4481; PP. 506-508; BIBL. 18 REF.Article

ESTABLISHMENT AND MAINTENANCE OF PREFERENCE FOR NATURAL AND ARTIFICIAL OLFACTORY STIMULI IN JUVENILE RATSGALEF BG JR; KANER HC.1980; J. COMP. PHYSIOL. PSYCHOL.; ISSN 0021-9940; USA; DA. 1980; VOL. 94; NO 4; PP. 588-595; BIBL. 16 REF.Article

RESPONSES BY RATS TO ODORS FROM LIVING VERSUS DEAD CONSPECIFICSCARR WJ; LANDAUER MR; SONSINO R et al.1981; BEHAV. NEURAL BIOL.; ISSN 0163-1047; USA; DA. 1981; VOL. 31; NO 1; PP. 62-67; BIBL. 14 REF.Article

CLASSICAL CONDITIONING OF AN ODOR PREFERENCE IN 3-DAY-OLD RATSJOHANSON IB; TEICHER MH.1980; BEHAV. NEUR. BIOL.; USA; DA. 1980; VOL. 29; NO 1; PP. 132-136; BIBL. 5 REF.Article

RESPONSES OF FEMALE RATS TO ODORS FROM FAMILIAR VS. NOVEL MALESCARR WJ; DEMESQUITA WANDER M; SACHS SR et al.1979; BULL. PSYCHON. SOC.; USA; DA. 1979; VOL. 14; NO 2; PP. 118-120; BIBL. 24 REF.Article

DOES EARLY OLFACTORY EXPOSURE RESULT IN AN ODOR PREFERENCE OR THE LOSS OF AVOIDANCE.GOLDBLATT AS.1978; PERCEPT. MOTOR SKILLS; USA; DA. 1978; VOL. 47; NO 1; PP. 196-198; BIBL. 8 REF.Article

A SENSITIVE PERIOD FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF OLFACTORY PREFERENCE IN ACOMYS CAHIRINUS.PORTER RH; ETSCORN F.1976; PHYSIOL. AND BEHAV.; G.B.; DA. 1976; VOL. 17; NO 1; PP. 127-130; BIBL. 28 REF.Article

EVIDENCE THAT RATS DISCRIMINATE BETWEEN FAMILIAR AND UNFAMILIAR PUTATIVE URINARY ODORANTS OF ADULT MALE CONSPECIFICSFASS B; GUTERMANN PE; STEVENS DA et al.1978; AGRESS. BEHAV.; USA; DA. 1978; VOL. 4; NO 3; PP. 231-236; BIBL. 19 REF.Article

THE EFFECTS OF SOCIAL EXPERIENCE ON THE ODOUR PREFERENCES OF THE MONGOLIAN GERBIL (MERIONES UNGUICULATUS).HALPIN ZT.1978; BIOL. DU COMPORT.; FR.; DA. 1978; VOL. 3; NO 2; PP. 169-179; ABS. FR.; BIBL. 1 P. 1/2Article

OLFACTORY REACTIONS OF THE GREEN LACEWING, CHRYSOPA CARNEA, TO TRYPTOPHAN AND CERTAIN BREAKDOWN PRODUCTS.VAN EMDEN HF; HAGEN KS.1976; ENVIRONMENT. ENTOMOL.; U.S.A.; DA. 1976; VOL. 5; NO 3; PP. 469-473; BIBL. 5 REF.Article

THE EFFECTS OF CROSS-FOSTERING ON THE BEHAVIOUR OF TWO SPECIES OF NORTH AMERICAN LEMMINGS, DICROSTONYX GROENLANDICUS AND LEMMUS TRIMUCRONATUS. I. OLFACTORY PREFERENCESHUCK UW; BANKS EM.1980; ANIM. BEHAV.; ISSN 0003-3472; GBR; DA. 1980; VOL. 28; NO 4; PP. 1046-1052; BIBL. 34 REF.Article

MECHANISMS OF PLANT RESISTANCE IN SCOTCH PINE (PINUS SYLVESTRIS). V. CHANGES IN PEST POPULATION DURING FEEDING ON PINES HAVING DIFFERENT DEGREE OF RESISTANCE (RESIDUAL PREFERENDUM AND PHASE OF AFTERACTION).SMELYANETS VP.1977; Z. ANGEW. ENTOMOL.; DTSCH.; DA. 1977; VOL. 84; NO 4; PP. 344-353; ABS. ANGL.; BIBL. 14 REF.Article

FACTORS AFFECTING RODENTS' RESPONSES TO ODOURS OF STRANGERS ENCOUNTERED IN THE FIELD: EXPERIMENTS WITH ODOUR-BAITED TRAPSDALY M; WILSON MI; BEHRENDS P et al.1980; BEHAV. ECOL. SOCIOBIOL.; DEU; DA. 1980; VOL. 6; NO 4; PP. 323-329; BIBL. 13 REF.Article

COMPARISON OF THE CONDITIONED REFLEX ACTIVITY OF DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER STRAINS BRED FOR NEUROPHYSIOLOGICAL FEATURES AND OF MUTANT STRAINSSAVVATEEVA EV.1979; DOKL. BIOL. SCI.; ISSN 0012-4966; USA; DA. 1979; VOL. 242; NO 1-6; PP. 432-433; BIBL. 10 REF.Article

DIETARY-DEPENDENT CROSS-SPECIES SIMILARITIES IN MATERNAL CHEMICAL CUES.PORTER RH; DOANE HM.1977; PHYSIOL. AND BEHAV.; U.S.A.; DA. 1977; VOL. 19; NO 1; PP. 129-131; BIBL. 9 REF.Article

ODOR PREFERENCE AND URINE-MARKING SCALES IN MALE AND FEMALE RATS: EFFECTS OF GONADECTOMY AND SEXUAL EXPERIENCE ON RESPONSES TO CONSPECIFIC ODORS.BROWN RE.1977; J. COMP. PHYSIOL. PSYCHOL.; USA; DA. 1977; VOL. 91; NO 5; PP. 1190-1206; BIBL. 1 P.Article